on the objection of defendants’ counsel, Judge Lyons allowed both relative edges to submit a page brief as towards the kind of purchase.
Defendants’ motion for the stay associated with action, to compel arbitration, as well as for an order that is protective along with plaintiff’s cross-motion for the order striking defendants’ objections to discovery, had been argued before Judge Lyons on August 6, 2004. The movement judge identified the contract between plaintiff and defendants being a agreement of adhesion and noted that the difficulties presented were whether “the conditions in the contract are so that these are typically become enforced in the procedural dilemma of arbitration . after reviewing nj-new jersey instance legislation and decreasing to address the underlying dispute that plaintiff had with defendants as to the legality of pay day loans . .” and whether or not the arbitration plan as ” put forth is substantively such as for instance become unconscionable.” Judge Lyons decided these problems in support of defendants. Continue reading